SUCKERS

Franz Miklosich, in his work Etymologie der Slavischen Sprach, theorised that the Slavic synonyms ‘Upior’, ‘Uper’ and ‘Upyr’, which those familiar with vampire lore may recognise as the etymological origins of the modern term ‘vampire’, all derive from the Turkish word for witch, ‘uber’. How these terms evolved into the creatures of the night that we know and love today is the result of centuries of literary and folkloric interpretations and transformations. To understand this development, however, we must first look further back.

The first Slavic homeland was located north of the Carpathian Mountains, a region that, in modern times, spans the territories of several countries, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Ukraine, Slovakia and Serbia. During the First Slavic Migration, which began in 476 AD and continued until 700 AD, the extensive movement and expansion of populations eventually divided what had once been a singular cultural identity into several distinct cultural groups. This geographical and cultural expansion facilitated the development of diverse regional myths and folklore, particularly those concerning the undead.

In traditional Slavic mythology,‘vampires’ were less often blood-drinking humanoids than spirits of the dead. Those who had suffered a premature or wicked death were believed to remain among the living to fulfil their unfinished needs. In some accounts, they spread death and disease throughout villages; in others, they sought vengeance against those who had wronged them. These folkloric figures assumed distinct forms and names across their respective cultures. One example is the Russian koldun, a figure associated with sorcery and magical abilities, often depicted as an old, bearded man. This description is evocative of the earliest visual depictions of Dracula. Furthermore, according to Stanley Stepanic, a professor of Slavic Language and Literature, one of the earliest references to vampires appears in an Old Russian text dating to 1047 AD. A common feature of these myths, however, was their transmission among ordinary people, usually through oral storytelling within their homes rather than through written records.

The expansion of these myths into Western Europe can be attributed to several factors. One proposed explanation connects their spread to the 1686 Siege of Buda, during which the Holy Roman Empire took control of Buda (modern-day Budapest). This brought the Slavic population within the region under the control of a wider Western European power. Consequently, myths and stories concerning undead spirits, haunting shadows and those capable of rising from the grave began circulating among Imperial troops. In his article ‘The Horrors of History: Vampires’, Coy Hall writes: “Soldiers carried the idea to cosmopolitan centers like Vienna and Berlin. From there, the vampire moved to Paris. From Paris to London. From London to the Americas”.

Another factor contributing to the expansion of vampire lore was the eighteenth-century ‘Vampire Epidemic’. This does not mean, however, that smaller outbreaks of vampire hysteria had not occurred in Eastern Europe before this period. At the time, limited knowledge of the decomposition of the human body frequently caused fear and confusion, prompting people to explain unfamiliar phenomena through the knowledge available to them. Such circumstances contributed to episodes of vampiric hysteria associated with the spread of disease, including those recorded in Serbia in 1725 and 1726 and in other Western countries. Corpses believed to belong to vampires were exhumed in Eastern European villages, as people sought to prevent them from spreading further death. Measures taken against these suspected vampires included burning, staking and shooting their bodies.

Diseases such as rabies, pellagra and porphyria, alongside influenza, tuberculosis and cholera, contributed to the association between vampires and the spread of illness. These conditions could produce visible physical manifestations that people interpreted as evidence of vampirism. Porphyria, for example, can cause sensitivity to sunlight, resulting in exposed skin blistering, itching or eroding and often leaving affected individuals paler. Such symptoms bear a striking resemblance to familiar descriptions of vampires. Furthermore, the erosion of the skin and gums could make the teeth appear more prominent, creating another potentially vampiric characteristic. The disease could also cause urine to become dark red, which was interpreted as evidence that an individual was consuming blood. Compounding this association, physicians attempting to manage symptoms that they believed were related to red blood cells sometimes recommended that patients drink animal blood. This practice also recalls the nineteenth century, when doctors advised individuals suffering from consumption to drink animal blood.

As Rachel Erin Catlett Widmer writes in Curing Consumption: Blood Drinkers of the Nineteenth Century:

“Because physicians were not able to cure consumption, desperate victims turned to an unlikely cure from an unlikely source, the butcher, a trade worker. The grotesque imagery of a pale, emaciated consumptive victim drinking blood from a freshly slaughtered animal conjures one image strongly, that of a vampire”

Pallor, sensitivity to sunlight, anaemia and other such symptoms are, of course, reminiscent of the physical characteristics commonly attributed to the undead. The fear surrounding disease and death spread throughout the Eastern Hemisphere, propelling the cultural prominence of vampires and bringing them to the attention of authors and poets alike. Without this hysteria and the illnesses associated with it, it remains uncertain whether works such as Bram Stoker’s Dracula would ever have come to fruition, given that much of its influence derived from foreign folklore and the circumstances in which such beliefs flourished.

Before turning to Dracula, however, we must first consider the early works of vampire literature. The following sections examine several influential examples that helped shape the literary tradition of the vampire and the broader subject explored throughout this essay.

In 1819, John William Polidori published The Vampyre, an 84-page work of Gothic fiction about Aubrey, an orphaned man, and his new companion, the charismatic aristocrat Lord Ruthven, who accompanies him on his travels throughout Europe. Ruthven is described as “handsome, frank, and rich.” He is seductive and hedonistic, engages in relationships with numerous women, and possesses a penchant for gambling. His demeanour remains unchanged even when he loses most of his money. Although his charisma is palpable to many, it also provokes the ire of others. Aubrey finds the rest of his character difficult to interpret, noting that Ruthven’s mouth communicates more than his eyes. Despite their travels together, Aubrey feels that he understands the man progressively less, finding each conversation increasingly exasperating. One example occurs in Italy, where Lord Ruthven arranges a rendezvous with a woman, much to Aubrey’s horror.

“[...] he entered the apartment of Lord Ruthven, and abruptly asked him his intentions with respect to the lady, informing him at the same time that he was aware of his being about to meet her that very night. Lord Ruthven answered, that his intentions were such as he supposed all would have upon such an occasion; and upon being pressed whether he intended to marry her, merely laughed.”

— The Vampyre, John William Polidori, p. 38, lines 15–24

Following this incident, and at the request of his guardians, who communicate their concerns in a letter, Aubrey is urged to distance himself from the indulgent Lord and continue his travels independently. They believe that an evil power resides within his companion. Aubrey subsequently travels to Greece, where he meets a young woman; perhaps a girl, named Ianthe, for whom he quickly develops an affection. He repeatedly describes her as youthful, innocent, and “fairy-like.” He also emphasises the shame Aubrey feels at the prospect of marrying a woman so innocent and uneducated, given his position as a scholarly gentleman.

As Aubrey travels throughout Greece, Ianthe begins warning him of the dangers that emerge at night, particularly in the forests, where vampires are said to engage in their “nocturnal orgies.” The physical descriptions of these creatures bear an eerie resemblance to Lord Ruthven. Despite his fear, Aubrey nevertheless ventures out, only to encounter an attack by one of these vampires. Before reaching him, however, the creature has already attacked his beloved Ianthe, whose body is discovered torn and bitten raw. The only evidence left behind is a strange dagger.

Aubrey becomes ill and feverish following this discovery. Lord Ruthven, however, comes to his bedside and cares for him throughout his sickness. This experience eventually restores their friendship, allowing them to continue travelling through the less explored regions of Greece. Their renewed companionship is short-lived, however, as a group of bandits attacks them during their journey, leaving Lord Ruthven gravely wounded. With his final words, he addresses Aubrey:

“Swear by all your soul reveres, by all your nature fears, swear that for a year and a day you will not impart your knowledge of my crimes or death to any living being in any way, whatever may happen, or whatever you may see.”

— The Vampyre, John William Polidori, p. 55, lines 3–8

Aubrey swears not to speak of Ruthven, honouring his final request. The only object the Lord leaves behind is an intricate dagger sheath, matching the sheath of the dagger discovered at the scene of Ianthe’s murder. Aubrey soon returns to London. Everything initially appears to be well until Lord Ruthven himself stands before him, alive and apparently unharmed, threatening him with the consequences of breaking his oath. Matters become even more unfortunate when Aubrey discovers that Ruthven is to marry his sister.

Unable to warn her of the danger posed by Ruthven’s undead nature, Aubrey descends into hysterics and becomes gravely ill once again. On the day of the wedding, he desperately attempts to persuade his sister to delay the ceremony. His letter warning her of the danger, however, arrives too late: she has already suffered the Lord’s deathly bite.

Although The Vampyre may not be the most widely known work of vampire literature, it was among the most influential in popularising the genre during its time. It is therefore worth examining what makes Lord Ruthven such an effective character and why his actions remain significant.

First, Ruthven possesses an extraordinary degree of charisma and an evident affinity for women, whom he seduces with ease wherever he travels. This is a trope that modern audiences recognise as central to the familiar vampire archetype: a creature whose magnetism draws victims closer by gaining their trust through kind gestures, persuasive words, and sexual appeal. The vampire’s bloodlust centres on the blood within another person, their body and what it can provide. In this sense, the vampire’s desire for blood also becomes a desire for the person who possesses it.

Women repeatedly fall under Ruthven’s influence. Is this attraction the result of a passive supernatural ability, or does it arise from his distinctly human charisma? Why should it not be both?

Furthermore, Lord Ruthven demonstrates little concern for his personal finances. He gambles without apparent fear of losing, and even substantial losses have little effect on him. In such moments, it becomes clear that he is gambling for the thrill rather than the reward. This behaviour evokes the monotony that immortality may bring to the undead. Without wishing to anticipate a later discussion, the 1994 film Interview with the Vampire expresses this idea particularly well: “The world changes, we do not, there lies the irony that finally kills us.” Ruthven’s debauchery, combined with his indifference to the consequences of his actions for those around him, already establishes him as an unusual and seemingly fearless entity, even before his vampirism is considered.

The story is not, of course, a work of mystery or detective fiction. The reader knows almost immediately who the titular character is as soon as he is introduced. This certainty arises, in no small part, from the way Ruthven is characterised: not through fangs or blood, but through his attitude and, in many respects, his overall impression. The warning signs provided by Ianthe further reinforce this interpretation. She describes a dangerous beast lurking outside that happens to share the Lord’s appearance, while the dagger and its sheath provide additional clues.

I would also like to examine the juxtaposition between Ianthe and Lord Ruthven. Ianthe represents the pinnacle of innocence and youth within the story, whereas Ruthven embodies their opposites. She is barely educated, while he possesses a degree of knowledge that Aubrey can scarcely comprehend. She is devoted to Aubrey, while Ruthven is a habitual womaniser. When Ianthe dies at his hands, it is not unreasonable to suggest that her innocence and youth are, quite literally, taken from her and used to sustain the Lord’s eternal existence.

This reflects a recurring trope in vampire fiction: the young woman who becomes the vampire’s victim, often in connection with her chastity. In my view, this dynamic could be described as a form of vampire BDSM. Both Ianthe and Ruthven can, in a sense, be understood as mythological creatures: she resembles a fairy, while he is a vampire. Yet they never interact directly until the moment of her death.

In her 2020 essay, An Exploration of the Vampire and its Sexuality, Jamie Hall discusses the relationship between Dracula and sexuality in several respects. Although the present discussion concerns The Vampyre, Hall’s analysis illuminates the broader significance of this trope:

“In many tales falling for a rake would leave a female character as contaminated as ‘morally depraved’. Just like this societal label of depravity Dracula leaves behind his own contamination on the innocent women who fall beneath his charms.”

— Jamie Hall, “An Exploration of the Vampire and its Sexuality”

Another particularly compelling aspect of Lord Ruthven’s vampiric nature is his use of the oath. It would be possible to examine how this ability contributes to the development of the powers associated with vampires in later literature. Instead, I would like to focus on how intriguing this particular ability is, especially given how rarely it appears in more contemporary iterations.

The power to bind another person to their word, to enforce a promise for whatever period the other party demands, is a fascinating narrative device and a compelling supernatural ability. Lord Ruthven repeatedly makes Aubrey swear upon his life that he will honour the promise, almost as though he were compelling him to sign an invisible contract, much like a demon or devil might.

Aubrey’s inability to warn his sister of the danger standing beside her eventually plunges him into a nervous breakdown. This predicament is also deeply unsettling for the reader, who is placed in a position resembling Aubrey’s own: the reader recognises the danger but remains unable to warn the sister. In this sense, the reader is also constrained by Ruthven’s oath.

But how did John William Polidori come to write The Vampyre?

During the summer of 1816, Polidori stayed at Lord Byron’s summer residence in the village of Cologny, alongside Mary and Percy Shelley. During their time together, they exchanged ghost stories. Polidori was also serving as Byron’s physician in residence. The group entertained themselves with German ghost stories before eventually agreeing that each would write a story of their own, based on a supernatural myth.

“Two other friends [...] and myself agreed to write each a story, founded on some supernatural occurrence.”

— Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, Preface and Letters, 1818

It is worth noting that Shelley refers to two other friends, one of whom was certainly not Polidori. Ouch. We know that Polidori was present through his own diary entries and his connection to Lord Byron, yet his contribution apparently did not merit a mention from Mary Shelley at this point. This is an amusing detail that I will expand upon later.

What some readers may not know is that Polidori did not originally write The Vampyre for the contest. Instead, he wrote a story about a skull-headed woman and a peephole. This story was never published, and little else is known about it. Lord Byron was the one who originally conceived the idea of writing about a vampire and even composed several paragraphs of the prose before abandoning it. Polidori, however, expanded upon Byron’s idea and eventually developed it into the literary work known today.

It is also worth noting that, while studying, Polidori was writing his doctoral thesis on somnambulism, or “Oneirodynia,” as he termed it. This subject may have influenced his development of the story. He also studied at Edinburgh, where grave robbing, or “resurrectioning”, was a common practice used to obtain bodies for anatomy lessons. This experience may likewise have influenced his ambitions for the story.

On 1 April 1819, The Vampyre was published in London by Sherwood, Neely, and Jones, on Paternoster Row. It appeared, however, under a different name: Lord Byron’s. How did this happen? To understand the circumstances, we must look back a little.

By all accounts, including his own, John Polidori was rather unfortunate. He was clumsy, having once dropped a book on a woman’s head while attempting to look her in the eye, among other incidents involving dropped and broken glasses. In an account recounted by D. L. MacDonald in Poor Polidori, Polidori, while on a boat with Mary Shelley and Byron, struck Byron’s knees with an oar. When Byron recovered, he said:

“Be so kind, Polidori, another time, to take more care, for you hurt me very much.”

Polidori replied:

“I am glad of it … I am glad to see you can suffer pain.”

This is, if I may say, insane, and also unbelievably hilarious. Byron’s response was equally striking:

“Let me advise you, Polidori, when you, another time, hurt any one, not to express your satisfaction. People don't like to be told that those who give them pain are glad of it; and they cannot always command their anger. It was with some difficulty that I refrained from throwing you into the water; and, but for Mrs. Shelley's presence, I should probably have done some such rash thing.”

— Thomas Moore, The Life, Letters and Journals of Lord Byron, 1818

These anecdotes provide an increasingly clear picture of Polidori’s character. He became involved in fights, disputes, and other disagreements, and was detained, arrested, ridiculed, and mocked. His circumstances were evidently far from favourable. Much of this, however, was arguably the result of his own behaviour. His jealousy and desperate attempts to enter literary circles contributed to his being disregarded by his acquaintances.

One particularly embarrassing example occurred when he asked Lord Byron to read aloud a play he had written. The play was met with laughter, although Polidori maintained that the problem lay in the way Byron had read it rather than in the writing itself.

A brief digression concerning the relationship between Lord Byron and John Polidori is also worthwhile. In my opinion, there is an undeniable parallel between Aubrey and Lord Ruthven in The Vampyre and Polidori and Byron themselves. Byron was a sociable and widely admired figure, whereas Polidori was often more isolated and reserved.

In his essay The Haunted Writing Life of John Polidori, Bryan VanDyke succinctly suggests that Polidori was less a physician than a groupie. Polidori himself went out of his way to compare his position with Byron’s, describing himself as “a star in the halo of the moon, invisible.”

At some point after the group’s discussions about writing ghost stories, Polidori departed from Byron and his companions to travel to Germany. The reasons for his departure remain a matter of speculation, although it has been suggested that a falling-out with Byron left him too ashamed or embarrassed to return.

Polidori subsequently opened a small clinic in Norwich, where he treated local residents. He could not practise as a doctor in London because he had not yet reached the age of twenty-six, which was required to practise there. Matters initially appeared to be progressing relatively well. However, while travelling in a carriage, he sustained a brain injury after crashing into a tree. His injuries were so severe that he was believed to be dead, and a priest was summoned to perform his final rites. Nevertheless, he survived.

His circumstances soon deteriorated further. He discovered the popularity of the recently published Frankenstein, followed by the publication of The Vampyre under Lord Byron’s name. One can readily imagine Polidori, recovering from a brain injury and already thwarted in his literary ambitions, discovering that his story had been falsely attributed to the man around whom much of his life had revolved, and who may have excluded him from his estate. The situation is painful to contemplate.

Upon receiving a copy of the story, Lord Byron clarified the confusion, remarking that he knew nothing about vampires:

“Damn ‘the Vampire,’—what do I know of Vampires? it must be some bookselling imposture—contradict it in a solemn paragraph.”

He also went out of his way to state that he had no connection to the story whatsoever. The publication was subsequently corrected to identify Dr. Polidori as its author.

Thus, John William Polidori emerges as a pretentious man whose repeated attempts to enter literary circles were thwarted, whose poor attitude alienated his acquaintances, and whose presence was apparently not significant enough to be remembered by critical figures such as Mary Shelley. His story was falsely attributed to a man he both envied and loathed. Nevertheless, his contribution to vampire fiction was considerable, even though it developed from an idea he had not originated. Polidori later died by suicide at the age of twenty-five, bitter and alone. As Bryan VanDyke observes, “The Vampyre—as it were—killed him.”

In 1872, anyone in London with a single shilling to spare could purchase a literary magazine called The Dark Blue, in which the Irish author Sheridan Le Fanu published a short story titled Carmilla. Carmilla is a Gothic short story that has plagued my very soul for years. Le Fanu was renowned in both Irish and British literary circles as an exemplary writer of the abnormal, incorporating expressions of gender and sexuality into his work. This gets exemplified and no-better displayed than in Carmilla, which brings together not just supernaturalism but naturalism.

The story introduces us to Laura, a young and tender-hearted woman living in Styria with her father, several servants, and two ladies, Madame Perrodon and Mademoiselle de Lafontaine.

Laura's mother died during her infancy. They reside in a modest mansion, or schloss, near a forest, far removed from any town or other settlement.

It quickly becomes apparent that the story is written by Laura herself, years after the events took place, as she recounts them with considerable caution. She describes an incident from her early childhood in which she awoke during the night and encountered a beautiful woman who soothed her distress and brought her back to bed. The woman then bit the young Laura, causing her to shriek in pain and summoning the other members of the household to her chamber. Laura explains that, despite her maids' and father's attempts to dissuade her from believing the experience had occurred, suggesting that it had merely been a maid beside her or an unpleasant nightmare, the memory has never left her. In the present, Laura wanders through the gardens with her father, who informs her that their expected visitors, General Spielsdorf and his niece, Mademoiselle Rheinfeldt, will not be arriving because the niece has died. Laura is deeply saddened by the news, as her melancholy disposition is largely a consequence of her loneliness within the manor.

As though perfectly timed, a carriage crashes by the roadside, leaving its occupants stranded. Laura's father rushes to assist them and encounters an unnamed woman and her daughter, who is momentarily unconscious. The mother explains that she is in a terrible hurry and cannot postpone her journey to an important meeting. She asks the family to care for her daughter while she continues with her servants to attend to this urgent appointment. Laura pleads for the young woman to be allowed to stay, and her father kindly agrees. The daughter is, of course, Carmilla.

The servants and maids of the schloss attend to Carmilla while Laura eagerly anticipates the possibility of making a new friend and ending her isolation. When the time comes, Laura visits the room in which Carmilla is resting, and the two formally meet:

“She was sitting up; her slender pretty figure enveloped in the soft silk dressing gown, embroidered with flowers, and lined with thick quilted silk, which her mother had thrown over her feet as she lay upon the ground. […] I saw the very face which had visited me in my childhood at night, which remained so fixed in my memory, and on which I had for so many years so often ruminated with horror, when no one suspected of what I was thinking. It was pretty, even beautiful; and when I first beheld it, wore the same melancholy expression.”

— Sheridan Le Fanu, Carmilla, p. 23, lines 4–16

Magnetism, does that sound familiar? Love at first sight? Perhaps Laura is struck by infatuation, fear, or bliss upon seeing a face she has encountered only in her dreams and nightmares.

Carmilla recounts that she, too, remembers a dream of Laura, whom she describes as golden-haired and blue-eyed, from when they were young. In Carmilla's account, Laura comforted her when she awoke in distress, brought her to bed, and laid her down before Laura's horrified screams awakened her once again in the nursery. Laura, in turn, shares her own dream, and the two rejoice at the apparent coincidence that has brought them together. Are they soulmates? Perhaps not, but there is certainly a sense of destiny in their meeting.

There is insufficient time or space to describe fully how captivated Laura is by Carmilla and how enchanting she finds their reunion. She repeatedly describes Carmilla as beautiful and emphasises how drawn to her she feels. She blushes when Carmilla holds her, and Carmilla's own cheeks flush when she holds Laura's hand and looks at her with the tenderness one might expect from someone who has known another person for years. To examine every instance in which the writing emphasises their touching, embracing, and whispering sweet nothings to one another would take considerably more time than we have.

Chapter Four begins with Laura describing Carmilla's appearance in detail, once again emphasising the young woman's beauty, from her figure and hair to her movements. Carmilla's obsession with Laura becomes particularly apparent when she declares her feelings while holding her hand:

“You are mine, you shall be mine, you and I are one forever.”

— Carmilla, p. 30

As readers, we recognise this as the expression of a vampire's lust and love for someone upon whom she has fixed her attention. Laura, however, finds the declaration strange and confusing, attributing it to whatever mysterious illness might cause Carmilla to make such romantically possessive remarks. As Laura asks, “[...] what can you mean by all this?” (p. 30).

Laura also describes Carmilla's unusual habits. She does not descend from her room until one o'clock, eats very little beyond a cup of chocolate, and becomes exhausted when walking in the sunlight. Readers recognise these behaviours as signs of vampirism, particularly her sensitivity to sunlight and lack of appetite. To Laura, however, they could just as easily indicate that Carmilla is unwell.

The story continues with the two young women resting beneath a tree and watching their surroundings when a funeral procession passes, accompanied by a funeral hymn. Carmilla becomes irritated, questioning why people make such a spectacle of death when everyone eventually dies. The singing angers her further, and she clutches her ears before dragging Laura away. Her reaction suggests a particular aversion to anything associated with death, as though she feels compelled to defend herself against it. Laura remains unaware of the significance of this behaviour.

The women are subsequently visited by a travelling medicine seller who offers amulets, trinkets, and other small objects. Both purchase a necklace intended to ward off an “oupire”- a vampire, a term that recalls the creature's Eastern European origins. The man also offers dentistry tools, having noticed how sharp and pointed Carmilla's teeth appear from where he stands. This observation further angers her, prompting her to storm away.

If further clues regarding Carmilla's nature were needed, the following chapter provides them. The family discovers an old portrait of Mircalla Karnstein, painted in 1698, whose subject resembles Carmilla in every detail, down to the mole on her neck. The reader might respond with a sigh of recognition, yet Laura simply admires the painting. Convinced by Carmilla's explanation that she is merely a descendant of the woman depicted, Laura loves the portrait so much that she hangs it in her bedroom.

Chapter Six presents a tense scene in which Laura retires to bed after speaking with Carmilla. She experiences a waking agony, which she suspects may be a nightmare. She becomes paralysed, caught between wakefulness and sleep, while a dark creature crawls over her. The only features she can distinguish in the shadows are its broad eyes. She feels pain in her breast as she is bitten and fed upon, and she screams, awakening at that very moment.

A figure with loose hair and a dress sits beside her bed, its appearance suggestive of a woman. It vanishes through the door. Laura fears that the door has been left unlocked, but when she checks, she finds that it remains securely locked. The agony does not disappear, even when she sleeps with the amulet purchased from the medicine seller beside her chest. Although she no longer awakens in fear or pain, her feverish nights continue. At times, she experiences little more than discomfort; at others, she feels as though the night itself is caressing her, its warm lips resting against her cheek and throat. She grows progressively weaker and paler, as though her life force is being drained away.

I will move quickly through the remaining events so that we can examine their deeper implications. An unnamed doctor is summoned to examine Laura. Upon discovering her exhaustion and the bite marks scattered across her neck, he concludes that a vampire must be responsible. He informs her father but does not tell Laura herself. Her father becomes agitated and decides to keep her unaware of the cause of her illness. Consequently, he does not explain why they are travelling to Karnstein, although he informs Carmilla that she may accompany them when she awakens.

During their journey, they encounter General Spielsdorf and invite him to join them. He agrees and explains the death of his niece, Bertha. After meeting a beautiful woman named Millarca at a masquerade, Bertha had taken her into her home at her mother's request and subsequently began to grow gravely ill. The circumstances are familiar: the General eventually discovers that his niece's illness was caused by a vampire named Millarca.

During their journey, Laura, her father, the General, and Madame Perrodon enter a chapel. Carmilla appears there as well. Laura is delighted to see her friend, but the General becomes enraged and attempts to attack her. Carmilla evades him and disappears. The General identifies her as Millarca, leaving Laura confused and unwilling to believe his accusations.

Baron Vordenburg then enters the story, a sudden appearance, as the narrative itself almost invites us to acknowledge. He is a middle-class man who previously saved the region surrounding Karnstein from vampire attacks. He assists the General and Laura's father in locating the grave of Countess Mircalla.

With the pieces finally falling into place, Laura and her father begin their journey home, collecting a priest along the way. Laura remains confused and saddened by Carmilla's absence from the estate. The following day, the General, Laura's father, and the Baron discover Carmilla's tomb. She lies in a pool of blood, the very substance that sustains her existence, and the decision of what must be done becomes clear. Carmilla is killed, bringing her reign of terror against the innocent to an end and relieving Laura of her suffering.

Laura eventually understands what has happened. Her innocence has been stripped away, her trust shattered, and her heart wounded by the realisation that the person she cared for has used her. She recognises that their apparent courtship served the purpose of allowing Carmilla to feed upon her. Nevertheless, she continues to mourn the intimacy they shared, even many years later. Laura concludes her account with the following words:

“It was long before the terror of recent events subsided; and to this hour the image of Carmilla returns to memory with ambiguous alternations-sometimes the playful, languid, beautiful girl; sometimes the writhing fiend I saw in the ruined church; and often from a reverie I have started, fancying I heard the light step of Carmilla at the drawing-room door.”

— Sheridan Le Fanu, Carmilla, 1872, p. 96, lines 16–21

Although Carmilla may not be the most widely recognised work in vampire literature, it remains a distinctive and influential contribution to the genre, inspiring Dracula only a few years later. Its interwoven themes of lust, death, love, the supernatural, and Anglo-Irish colonialism make it a fascinating text to examine, particularly in the context of its publication.

The themes of love, lust, and death are brought together through the characters and their relationships. Carmilla's courtship of Laura is imbued with a sense of foreboding. The reader understands that every caress, embrace, and expression of admiration serves to distract Laura from Carmilla's ultimate purpose: feeding upon her. The same pattern is evident in Carmilla's earlier victim, Bertha. Carmilla seduces young women, gains their affection and trust, and then kills them.

This recalls The Vampyre, in which Lord Ruthven seduces numerous innocent women, ultimately costing Ianthe her life. Laura's innocence is gradually eroded as she encounters the horrors associated with Carmilla, losing the naivety she displays earlier in the text. Yet it is precisely her adoration of Carmilla that keeps her unaware of the danger for so long.

Throughout the story, Laura repeatedly describes experiencing both love and detestation towards Carmilla. These contradictory emotions may arise from the intensity of their relationship, their physical intimacy, or something else entirely.

“I experienced a strange tumultuous excitement that was pleasurable, ever and anon, mingled with a vague sense of fear and disgust. I had no distinct thoughts about her while such scenes lasted, but I was conscious of a love growing into adoration, and also of abhorrence.”

— Sheridan Le Fanu, Carmilla, 1872, p. 29, lines 20–24

Is Laura uncomfortable with Carmilla's behaviour, or with her own reactions to the feelings Carmilla provokes in her? Both interpretations are worth exploring.

On the one hand, Carmilla can be interpreted as a predator who preys upon an innocent generation. Many of her touches and advances towards Laura resemble the behaviour of a demanding partner who seeks affection but responds with anger when that affection is questioned. It is also important to recall the opening of the story, in which Laura describes Carmilla visiting her as a child, luring her into a sense of comfort before, for lack of a better word, assaulting her.

The relationship portrayed between them is neither healthy nor normal, and it certainly does not represent a healthy, consensual queer relationship.¹⁷ Carmilla exploits Laura's innocence and her limited understanding of interpersonal boundaries, allowing herself to act as she pleases. She demands that Laura comfort her during the funeral, for example, and then becomes angry when Laura questions her behaviour.

When Laura joins in with the funeral hymns, Carmilla complains, “You pierce my ears” (p. 31). After making Laura stop by disparaging her singing and emotional response, she commands:

“Sit down here, beside me; sit close; hold my hand; press it hard—hard—harder.”

— Carmilla, p. 32

This behaviour suggests a controlling and potentially abusive dynamic, one that Laura is still too naive to recognise fully.

Nevertheless, despite the troubling nature of their relationship when examined through a contemporary lens, Carmilla became a touchstone for queer representation in literature, particularly the representation of lesbian relationships. Laura is so conflicted by Carmilla's behaviour that she briefly wonders whether Carmilla might be a suitor in disguise, perhaps even presenting herself in drag.

During the nineteenth century, queer relationships became both a new and a recurring political concern, attracting the scrutiny of courts and the wider public. Carmilla can also be interpreted as a cautionary tale shaped by the religious perspectives of Irish and British society, particularly British society, concerning the supposed consequences of lesbian and queer relationships.

Carmilla's visit to Laura during childhood may recall Lilith, Lilitu, Lamia, or Lamme, figures from Assyrian, Babylonian, and ancient Hebrew legends who were mythologised as beings that pursued and consumed the blood of the young. The female vampire may also evoke prehistoric goddesses and mother deities associated with pagan worship, figures that represented the very antithesis of the ideal woman as understood by Protestant and Catholic traditions. From this perspective, such women were not regarded as women at all, but as a mythological other. This interpretation allowed the relationship to be understood by the religiously traditional Victorian public as one between a beast and an innocent girl who had become its victim.

In 1861, homosexual relationships between men ceased to carry the death penalty, although imprisonment and hard labour remained punishments. Lesbian relationships, however, were not addressed by these laws and were therefore not technically illegal in the same sense. One reason for this distinction was that close female friendships were considered socially acceptable. In “Anne Lister's Construction of Lesbian Identity,” published in the Journal of the History of Sexuality, Anna Clark writes:

“[...] they kissed, embraced, and exchanged intensely romantic letters, but rarely if ever progressed to genital sex. As a result, society regarded such friendships as perfectly respectable, even touching.”

The primary concern was the sexual aspect of queer relationships. Since women were not understood to be capable of penetrating one another, their relationships were not perceived as threats to sexual propriety. Such relationships were not considered a genuine possibility within the prevailing social framework, making the development of a recognisable lesbian identity difficult.

This context helps explain the angle from which Carmilla was approached. Female friendship was socially acceptable, but what was to be made of a relationship such as this? Carmilla's metaphorical, and possibly literal, orgasmic reactions to Laura's touch and embrace, expressed through her rapid breathing and flushed face when she releases the younger woman, suggest that she experiences pleasure and gratification without the two women engaging in sexual intercourse.

In my view, their relationship may also recall the ways in which some women in nineteenth-century England sought to normalise their lesbian relationships by adopting more masculine presentations, taking dominant roles, or disguising themselves as men entirely.

Carmilla, however, is not visually characterised as masculine. She has long hair, wears dresses and loose robes, and is consistently described as beautiful and pretty. Nevertheless, her attitude towards Laura is dominant, while Laura is comparatively submissive, allowing their relationship to resemble conventional gender roles.

Carmilla is assertive and has a deep voice. She takes the lead and initiates the intimate actions the two women share. In real life, the French artist Rosa Bonheur frequently wore masculine clothing, which allowed her to assume a more masculine role in her relationships and enabled those relationships to follow what was regarded as a “normal pattern.”

I find it difficult to argue that this novel is progressive, or even a pioneer for queer rights, including in the context of its own time. Nevertheless, it is unquestionably meaningful.

The novel also contains distinct feminist themes, portraying strong matriarchal figures. The mother, for instance, stands on equal footing with the father and engages with him as an equal in conversation. The narrative's focus on female characters, relationships, and complexity is also significant. In the Victorian period, women were often perceived as fragile, meek, and dependent upon men, whether husbands or fathers, making the novel's focus a notable contrast.

Neither Laura's father nor General Spielsdorf can control what happens to Laura and his niece, respectively. It is almost as though their traditional roles have been reversed. Ultimately, however, it is the men who discover and destroy Carmilla, freeing Laura and saving the surrounding countryside.

The novel therefore challenges certain boundaries while continuing to rely upon traditional gender roles to advance its central narrative through figures such as the doctor, Baron Vordenburg, the General, and Laura's father.

Furthermore, Carmilla does not represent lesbianism and complex female relationships alone. She may also represent the British aristocracy during the period of Anglo-Irish colonialism, or does she? At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Ireland remained deeply affected by the aftermath of the Irish Rebellion of 1798. Many prisoners continued to be transported to Australia, while unrest persisted in parts of County Wicklow. Another rebellion, led by Robert Emmet in 1803, also ended in failure.

The Acts of Union, which legally integrated Ireland into the British state, were motivated in large part by the desire to address grievances associated with the 1798 uprising. They were also intended to prevent further destabilisation of Britain and protect against the possibility of foreign invasion using Ireland as a strategic base. Although Ireland and Irish characters are not explicitly mentioned in Carmilla, the author's background provides a basis for examining the struggle between Ireland and British rule. In the sources I consulted, I encountered two principal interpretations of which character might represent Ireland. Environmental details also provide possible indications of Irish otherness under British rule. Laura's castle, or schloss, is effectively isolated from the wider world. She explains that no other estates are comfortably close enough to visit. This solitude evokes the position of Ireland at the time, isolated and left with little support beneath the overwhelming presence of the British Empire. The forest surrounding the castle can be understood as a metaphor for the Empire, engulfing the estate and separating it from neighbouring people.

But how does Sheridan Le Fanu develop this theme? In “Re-inventing Irishness in Sheridan Le Fanu's Carmilla,” Ana Gratiela Gal argues that Carmilla embodies the Irish as an impure and excluded other. Victorian England maintained strict distinctions between what was considered English, and therefore proper and pure, and what was regarded as non-English, and consequently improper or other. In the context of mass immigration into Victorian England, foreigners became a prominent embodiment of otherness, as did their religions and identities perceived as un-English. Homosexual people were also included within this category, as homosexuality was argued to threaten the stability of the English nation and to undermine Englishness itself.

In this sense, Carmilla may embody the other. She is explicitly provocative towards Laura in a queer manner, but she is also a foreigner who enters Laura's life through a literal crash. She is perceived as monstrous and strange, an ‘other’standing in opposition to what Laura considers proper. Sheridan Le Fanu may therefore be portraying Ireland as it was perceived by England, using Carmilla to present this perspective in a somewhat tongue-in-cheek manner for English readers.

An alternative interpretation appears in Michael Kellermeyer's essay, “J. Sheridan Le Fanu's Carmilla: Inspirations, Interpretations, & a Deep Literary Analysis.” Kellermeyer argues that Carmilla represents the alluring yet oppressive Victorian English aristocracy, while Laura occupies the position of Victorian Ireland. Kellermeyer also suggests that Laura's father supports this interpretation. Although English by birth, he does not assimilate into English society and culture. Instead, his circumstances resemble those associated with Ireland: rural, impoverished, Catholic, and steeped in superstition. The analysis also considers Ireland's union with Imperial England, arguing that the story engages with the political and social consequences of such relationships:

“Le Fanu deftly angles into sexual and social politics in a bid to challenge what he saw as a contemptuous contentment in Victorian society – one which was happy to enter into political relationships with any nation, policy, company, or group so long as it was well credentialed and offered the prospect of fame or wealth.”

This interpretation could refer to the Act of Union in 1880, which dissolved the Irish Parliament and merged it with the British Parliament. This led to economic and political decline in Ireland and became an instrument of the later Great Famine, which spread starvation and illness throughout the Irish population. Viewed through this interpretation, Carmilla represents Victorian England. Through manipulation and enticing promises, such as the English promise to abolish the Penal Laws as a reason for passing the Act of Union, she ultimately corrupts Laura, leaving her sick and dependent.

Returning to Ana Gratiela Gal's study, she offers an argument that, in my view, supports both interpretations of the novel's colonial themes. Gal argues that blood, which signifies a person's identity and lineage, functions in Carmilla as a metaphor for contamination between national identities:

“Its presence no longer assures the safe circulation of pure blood, but produces the anxiety of racial contamination since the vampiric blood is a hybrid; in the vampire’s veins, there flows a mixture of human and monstrous blood”.

Gal suggests that this reflects how Ireland was perceived through Victorian English eyes: as a foreign beast threatening to contaminate English identity and its supposed racial purity. I can also see how this argument might be understood from the Irish perspective. In that reading, the British represent the beast that arrives to ruin Ireland, bringing with it a blood that threatens to infect the population with sickness. The vampire thus becomes a colonising force, seeking to dominate not only Ireland but also the surrounding world. This interpretation can be associated with the fall of Karnstein and Bertha at the hands of Countess Mircalla.

There are several other subjects that could be explored in Carmilla, including prostitution, family heritage, female sexuality, and religion. Rather than attempting to cover them all, I will turn to the story's considerable influence on vampire literature.

Its influence was substantial. Carmilla became an important inspiration for Dracula, the wider horror genre, and subsequent modern adaptations of vampire fiction. It is difficult to critique or examine later works about vampires without referring to the tropes Carmilla helped establish, including sensitivity to sunlight, associations with death, and sharp fangs used to drink blood. I had also hoped to include a discussion of Sheridan Le Fanu's life and the circumstances surrounding the creation of Carmilla, as I did with John William Polidori. However, I found little that was as compelling as the material surrounding Polidori.

Le Fanu was born to Thomas Philip Le Fanu, an Irish clergyman, and Emma Lucretia Dobbin. He studied law at Trinity College Dublin. In 1838, he began submitting stories to the Dublin University Magazine, pursuing his interests in writing and journalism. Among these early works was his first ghost story, “The Ghost and the Bone-Setter” (1838), although his early efforts were not particularly successful. By 1840, he had acquired ownership of several newspapers, including the Dublin Evening Mail, the Protestant Guardian, the Evening Packet, and the Warder. He later met and married Sussane Bennett, with whom he had four children. She died of illness in 1852, leaving him to descend into a period of profound sadness. Le Fanu subsequently sought to capitalise on the emerging literary trend of Sensationalism, embracing conventions popularised by Wilkie Collins, Charles Reade, and M. E. Braddon.

It has been theorised that Carmilla drew inspiration from Samuel Taylor Coleridge's 1816 poem Christabel, which tells the story of Laura and her father taking in an evil spirit disguised as a woman, as well as from the historical figure Elizabeth Báthory, a Hungarian noblewoman and serial killer who tortured and killed young women for their blood and bathed in it, believing it would preserve her youth.

When published, Carmilla attracted notable popularity among readers, although its reception was not as sensational as that of later vampire stories. Le Fanu died of a heart attack in 1873, at the age of fifty-eight, leaving behind a literary legacy that would inspire generations to come.

Most notably, his work would inspire Dracula.

The literary classic Dracula was written in 1896, during a period of mass English immigration, and marked a significant contribution to literature by the Irish writer Bram Stoker. It helped establish the foundations for many subsequent works of vampire literature. For this reason, it is important to analyse Stoker’s depiction of vampires, as it provides insight into the characteristics that would make these creatures so memorable in later renditions.

The novel begins through a series of letters and journal entries, including Jonathan Harker’s account of his journey to meet one of his clients, Count Dracula, which he recounts in correspondence with his fiancée, Mina Murray. The story opens with Jonathan Harker travelling from his home country of England through Munich, Vienna, and Budapest to Klausenburg, a city in Romania. Within the first two pages, he mentions the “Carpathian mountains; one of the wildest and least known portions of Europe”(p.2). As previously discussed, the Carpathian Mountains and the population of Eastern Europe were closely associated with the origins and spread of vampire mythology. The text therefore establishes an Eastern European setting from the outset, introducing environments and terminology that inform our subsequent analysis of a British man’s perception of this unfamiliar land.

Before departing for Dracula’s estate, Jonathan stays at a hotel, where several innkeepers warn him of the dangers ahead and advise him to stay away. They even provide him with a rosary and crucifix for his journey. These warnings establish a sense of tension and threat. The idea of a beast lurking at the edge of the forest also recalls the ways in which stories circulated through Eastern European folklore. Despite these warnings, Jonathan eventually reaches the Count’s estate, situated deep within the forests and countryside of Transylvania, where he meets Dracula himself: an imposing, frightening man whose touch is cold. The Count invites Jonathan inside and speaks with him briefly. Jonathan is there to help Dracula find a residence in London and navigate English bureaucracy. Although Jonathan is initially surprised by Dracula’s eloquence and generosity, the Count shows him to his room and offers him food while forbidding him from entering certain rooms in the castle.

Jonathan feels uneasy but attempts to rest. His discomfort intensifies, however, as he begins to notice increasingly strange aspects of the Count’s behaviour. Dracula has no reflection, does not appear to move about his palace during the daytime, never eats with Jonathan, and reacts violently upon seeing blood on Jonathan’s face after he shaves, even attempting to lunge at him. As Jonathan explores the estate, he discovers that every door and window is bolted shut. He eventually realises that “The castle is a veritable prison, and I am a prisoner!” (p.29). Jonathan becomes increasingly fearful and unsettled as he continues discussing English legal matters and paperwork with Dracula. At one point, he is horrified to discover the Count climbing down the side of the castle walls “just as a lizard” (p.38). He subsequently discovers that the Count sleeps in a box of earth, of which there are fifty in total. Each new discovery makes the situation increasingly incomprehensible to him.

After several further episodes of distress and prayers to God, Jonathan attempts to retire for the night. However, he finds no rest, as three beautiful but dangerous vampiric women approach him. This scene depicts Jonathan being lavished with kisses while lying on his bed, simultaneously frightened by and attracted to the women. He appears unable to resist their alluring touches. It is important to recognise that Jonathan occupies the submissive position in this dynamic, while the women take charge and initiate the sexual encounter. This reverses the traditional gender roles of the period. The encounter is abruptly interrupted when Dracula appears in a fury, chastising the three women for daring to touch what he declares belongs to him. Having reached his limits and descended into paranoia, Jonathan eventually escapes the Count’s estate by climbing down its walls. He concludes his journal entry with the words, “Good-bye, all! Mina!” (p.58).

Meanwhile, in England, Mina Murray, Jonathan’s fiancée, spends the summer in Whitby with her friend Lucy Westenra. Mina becomes concerned when she receives no word from Jonathan, who has been silent for months. Lucy, a beautiful and sweet-natured woman, becomes engaged to Arthur Holmwood, although she remains close to her other suitors, Dr. John Seward and Quincey Morris. While visiting Lucy in the seaside town of Whitby, Mina recounts the wreckage of a Russian schooner, the Demeter, being washed ashore at East Pier. The incident is accompanied by the horrifying discovery that a dead man had been lashed to the ship’s wheel while holding a crucifix. Two other details make the incident particularly strange: an “immense dog” springs from below the deck and runs off the ship, disappearing from sight, and fifty cases of earth are found aboard. These are the same kind of cases that Jonathan described in his journal as the boxes in which Dracula sleeps.

Aside from these peculiar events, the two women enjoy their time in Whitby. However, Lucy’s health suddenly begins to deteriorate for no apparent reason. She starts sleepwalking and wanders into a cemetery, where it is implied that Dracula bites her. This is suggested by her encounter with a creature described as “long and dark with red eyes” (p.108). Lucy grows increasingly pale and weak, and Mina becomes more concerned about her friend’s mysterious illness. Lucy’s condition rapidly worsens. She becomes exhausted and pale and appears to be losing her vitality. Despite repeated visits from doctors, including Dr. Seward, one of her rejected suitors, no one can identify the cause of her illness. Her sleepwalking becomes more frequent, and she wanders towards the cliffs near the sea, seemingly drawn towards something in the distance. Mina is alarmed by these nocturnal episodes, although Lucy appears unaware of them. Her condition continues to decline, and the doctors remain unable to explain the two red marks on her throat. Perplexed by Lucy’s condition, Dr. Seward contacts his former mentor, Professor Abraham Van Helsing, an expert in obscure medical phenomena. Van Helsing arrives in Whitby and quickly identifies that Lucy’s illness is not a sleep-related disorder. He begins taking special precautions, including administering blood transfusions and placing garlic flowers around her room. These measures appear to alleviate Lucy’s symptoms temporarily.

Van Helsing suspects that a vampire may be involved but initially withholds this theory from the others, including Lucy. Her mother, however, finds the garlic around Lucy’s room unpleasant and removes it, causing Lucy’s fits to return. Van Helsing eventually reveals his discovery to Dr. Seward, explaining that Lucy is the victim of vampirism. He describes a vampire as a supernatural creature that feeds on the blood of the living to sustain itself. He then assumes responsibility for Lucy’s treatment, increasing the use of garlic and other protective measures to shield her from the vampire’s influence.

One night, while Lucy and her mother are resting in her room, with her mother holding and soothing her, a large wolf breaks through the glass, frightening Lucy’s mother to death before attacking Lucy. Van Helsing and Dr. Seward arrive too late. Despite their attempts to warm Lucy’s body and perform blood transfusions, they are unable to save her. Lucy dies, and her funeral is held soon afterwards.

Van Helsing nevertheless remains vigilant, convinced that Lucy’s body requires further protection. One night, the group discovers that she has risen from the grave as one of the undead, thirsty and hungry for blood. She even attacks a young child and feeds on the child’s blood in a frenzy. Van Helsing, Arthur, Dr. Seward, and Morris conclude that Lucy must be destroyed to prevent her from spreading vampirism to other innocent people. Reluctantly, Arthur drives a stake through her heart, freeing her soul. The group is horrified by the necessity of their actions, but they understand that Lucy can never return to her former state. They believe it is better for her to die free than to remain bound to undeath and bloodlust.

Following his harrowing escape from Dracula’s estate, Jonathan reaches Budapest. Physically and emotionally exhausted after spending months trapped in the castle, he recounts his terrifying experiences with Dracula and reveals his belief that the Count is not merely a man but a vampire. Mina travels quickly to Budapest, where she and Jonathan are reunited. Mina learns of Lucy’s death and the circumstances surrounding it, and she becomes determined to join Jonathan in the fight against Dracula. They subsequently reunite with the others, now as a married couple.

Jonathan, Mina, Arthur, Dr. Seward, and Van Helsing form a plan to hunt down and destroy Dracula. As time passes, however, they realise that the Count has also been preying on Mina, drawing her increasingly under his dark influence. She begins to exhibit symptoms similar to those Lucy experienced, including a pale complexion, weakness, and a growing attraction to Dracula. As the group prepares for its hunt, they discover that Dracula can control wolves and other creatures of the night, forcing them to proceed with caution.

The group learns that they can sterilise the boxes of earth in which Dracula sleeps, thereby driving him out of England. Their pursuit of the Count across Europe begins as they follow the route he has taken while fleeing towards Transylvania. Along the way, they encounter numerous dangers as Dracula uses his supernatural powers to manipulate his surroundings. Mina’s transformation into a vampire becomes increasingly pronounced, and her connection to Dracula’s power grows stronger. The group faces further challenges and tragedies, including Quincey Morris being severely wounded during the pursuit.

The final confrontation takes place at Dracula’s castle in Transylvania, where the group encounters the vampire and his thralls: the three beautiful vampire women who had pursued Jonathan. They battle Dracula’s supernatural forces and eventually manage to corner the Count. Quincey, despite being gravely wounded, participates in the final confrontation and sacrifices his life in the process.

Ultimately, Jonathan and Quincey manage to destroy Dracula by driving a stake through his heart, decapitating him, and exposing him to sunlight, thereby destroying the beast once and for all. Dracula’s reign of terror ends, but at a great personal cost. Several years after his destruction, Mina and Jonathan are happily married and have a young son whom they name after Quincey. The novel concludes with a sense of peace as the characters reflect on their experiences. Although Dracula is gone, his memory lingers, and the group’s bond has been permanently strengthened by their shared ordeal. Quincey Morris, whose selfless sacrifice helped destroy Dracula, is remembered with reverence. The novel closes with a bittersweet sense of resolution, written by Jonathan, suggesting that although evil may be vanquished, its legacy endures.

This is a relatively complex story, with much to say and even more to disentangle when considering how vampires are portrayed. Stoker first describes Dracula’s appearance when Jonathan Harker arrives at the Count’s castle:

“Within, stood a tall old man, clean-shaven save for a long white mustache, and clad in black from head to foot, without a single speck of colour about him anywhere” (p.23).

Stoker uses visual descriptors such as tall, clean-shaven, and very pale, and depicts Dracula dressed entirely in black. Together, these details establish a peculiar image for readers when introducing a character whose arrival has been ominously foreshadowed in the preceding pages. The phrase “without a single speck of colour about him” evokes imagery associated with a ghost or an undead figure. This strangeness is further amplified by Stoker’s description of the Romanian citizens referring to Dracula as “‘Ordog’- Satan” (p.9). The reader is therefore predisposed to imagine that a devilish and unsightly creature resides at the estate.

This sense of eeriness continues as Stoker describes the Count’s physical capabilities when he interacts with Jonathan:

“He made no motion of stepping to meet me, but stood like a statue [...] he moved impulsively forward and holding out his hand grasped mine with a strength which made me wince, an effect which was not lessened by the fact that it seemed cold as ice, more like the hand of a dead than a living man” (p.24).

Stoker constructs the image not merely of a peculiar-looking man but of a figure whose supernatural abilities further suggest his inhumanity. Here, inhumanity describes the Count as pale, sickly, and undead, yet also superhumanly strong and dangerous. Stoker’s use of words such as wince to describe Jonathan’s response to Dracula’s strength and cold as ice to convey his unnatural body temperature associates the Count with fear. Dracula’s physical strength unsettles Jonathan, reinforcing the sense of danger surrounding him.

Stoker’s visual characterisation centres on the latent threat within the Count. He repeatedly emphasises how Dracula’s unusually powerful grip startles Jonathan and how his cold, apparently undead body suggests that he may be invincible. The description of his hand as resembling “the hand of a dead than a living man” reinforces this idea of undeath and contributes to the dehumanisation of the Count.

By feeding on the blood of others and thereby killing them, the Count becomes younger and less grotesque:

“There lay the Count, but looking as if his youth had been half-renewed, for the white hair and mustache were changed to dark iron-grey; the cheeks were fuller, and the white skin seemed ruby-red underneath” (p.75).

Stoker presents Dracula as a greedy monster who can sustain his own life only by taking the lives of others. This idea was widespread in England at the time, making it possible to argue that Dracula was based on Jack the Ripper, a serial killer theorised to have been part of the London Jewish community.

Later in the chapter, Stoker provides a more vivid description of the Count’s appearance through Jonathan’s account as he is led further into the castle:

“His face was a strong, a very strong, aquiline, with high bridge of the thin nose and peculiarly arched nostrils, with lofty domed forehead, and hair growing scantily round the temples but profusely elsewhere. His eyebrows were very massive, almost meeting over the nose, and with bushy hair that seemed to curl in its own profusion . . . with peculiarly sharp white teeth. These protruded over the lips, whose remarkable ruddiness showed astonishing vitality in a man of his years - his ears were pale, and at the tops extremely pointed.” (p.26–27).

This passage further establishes that the Count is not entirely human. In addition to his unnatural paleness, his extremely pointed ears and sharp white teeth protruding over his lips indicate his inhumanity, directing the reader towards a more monstrous, vampire-like appearance. Furthermore, when analysed more closely, these exaggerated traits can be linked to numerous antisemitic stereotypes concerning appearance that circulated in early Victorian England. The features described above, including the bushy eyebrows and pointed ears, as well as the subsequently discovered hooked nose and hairy hands, resemble the offensive caricatures of the “Villain Jew”.

It could be argued that Dracula was written in reaction to the waves of Eastern European immigration, which included many Jewish immigrants, that reached England in the late 1800s, provoking xenophobic fears among the English population. This depiction of otherness helped vilify Dracula in the eyes of the English public and reinforced harmful stereotypes. In Michael Galchinsky’s essay “Otherness and Identity in the Victorian Novel,” he writes:

“Victorian ‘Others’ were members of marginalized groups whose collective identity was perceived to differ in fundamental ways from the white, Protestant, English-speaking Victorian mainstream [...]. This was reinforced by immigration policies, economic and . . . the representations of Others in novels, poems, and plays.”

Another instance of the Count’s literary dehumanisation appears when Jonathan, having returned to England, spots Dracula in a crowd and is paralysed by shock:

“He was very pale, and his eyes seemed bulging out as . . . he gazed at a tall, thin man, with a beaky nose and black mustache and pointed beard . . . and big white teeth, that looked all the whiter because his lips were so red, were pointed like an animal’s” (p.246).

Once again, the emphasis on Dracula’s paleness, posture, hair, and nose recalls the novel’s first description of him: that of a dangerous, mysterious, and distinctly non-human creature with unusual physical characteristics. The comparison of the Count’s teeth to those of an animal further reinforces the vampire’s predatory nature.

The cultural treatment and depiction of queerness in literature have changed drastically over the past few decades, let alone centuries. In the nineteenth century, homosexuality was generally excluded from literature because it was considered a taboo “issue” and associated with the previously discussed threats of otherness, ostracisation, and punishment. One of the most prominent scenes involving these themes occurs when Jonathan Harker is pursued and preyed upon by Dracula’s trio of vampires, the“weird sisters,”after venturing into one of the dangerous areas of the castle from which the Count has forbidden him to enter.

Harker appears to be hypnotised by the women, yet remains frightened. As they continue to seduce him, Dracula discovers them and intervenes, furious at the sight of the women approaching Harker:

“‘How dare you touch him, any of you? How dare you cast eyes on him when I had forbidden it? . . . This man belongs to me! Beware how you meddle with him, or you’ll have to deal with me.’” (p.57).

Stoker immediately portrays the Count as protective and almost obsessive. Dracula reprimands the women for touching Harker and even looking at him, despite having forbidden them from doing so. This suggests that Dracula had warned them about Harker beforehand and had already established his sense of possession over him. The homoerotic implications are intensified by the declaration, “This man belongs to me!” Dracula makes this direct claim over Harker in a moment of rage, as the women attempt to seduce him. Later in the scene, Dracula expresses a gentle affection towards Harker, persistently attempting to speak with him, offering him food, and complimenting his skills. The weird sisters remark, “‘You yourself never loved. You never love!’” (p.57), to which Dracula responds, “‘Yes, I too can love. . . .’” (p.57), defending his protective attitude towards Harker. In this context, love refers to Harker.

The vampiresses take on the predatory and dominant role in this scene, while Harker remains passive and allows himself to be pursued. This dynamic was highly irregular within nineteenth-century English culture, which upheld traditional gender roles in which men were dominant pursuers and women were passive objects of pursuit. The portrayal of women in positions of power, whether in contrast to their male counterparts or through their own attitudes and actions, recalls a challenge to the strict gender expectations of the Victorian period, particularly in matters of sexuality. The women are the aggressors and initiators of the sexual encounter, and Stoker explicitly describes Harker’s reaction as one of surrender. He writes:

“There was something about them that made me uneasy, some longing and at the same time some deadly fear” (p.35).

This tension between desire and fear is familiar after our analysis of Carmilla. In this scene, Jonathan Harker can be understood as occupying a position similar to Laura’s, caught in the grasp of a dominant force that challenges English sexual boundaries. The women assume roles traditionally assigned to men, openly expressing their sexuality where women were expected to suppress it and channel it through their husbands for reproduction. The association between animalism, sexual behaviour, and dominance is reinforced when Jonathan observes that one of the sisters “licked her lips like an animal” (p.36). He becomes, in a sense, the swooning maiden, at the mercy of these aggressive creatures. Rather than fleeing or resisting, he remains passive and submissive, stating, “I closed my eyes in a languorous ecstasy and waited- waited with beating heart” (p.36).

Another significant theme concerning women in the novel is the rejection of motherhood, represented by Lucy. After becoming a vampire, she feeds on a child, an act that subverts the role she was expected to fulfil as a woman: dedicating her life to motherhood. This point is discussed in Stephanie Demetrakopoulos’s “Feminism, Sex Role Exchanges, and Other Subliminal Fantasies in Bram Stoker’s ‘Dracula’.” Alongside this argument, Demetrakopoulos observes that Stoker’s female characters are presented as abandoning the qualities associated with “good women”when they become vampires. When the three vampire women are reprimanded for pursuing Harker, for instance, they are instead satisfied by being given a child to consume.

Demetrakopoulos uses the following quotation to illustrate this point:

“The men discover Lucy with a child: With a careless motion, she flung to the ground, callous as a devil, the child that up to now she had clutched strenuously to her breast, growling over it as a dog growls over a bone. . . . There was a cold-bloodedness in the act which wrung a groan from Arthur” (p.236).

I would also like to point out that a female vampire is once again described as “growling like a dog over a bone,” reinforcing the aggression and animalistic qualities associated with Stoker’s female vampires. A woman’s transformation into a vampire becomes a metaphor for violently breaking the rules imposed upon her by the surrounding society. This rebellion is portrayed grotesquely through the consumption of children, the seduction and domination of men, the assumption of an aggressive sexual role, and the embodiment of danger. However, as in many works of the period, this portrayal of women has its limitations, as does the representation in Carmilla. Ultimately, the three vampire women remain subject to Dracula’s orders, while they and Lucy are killed through the actions of men. Their reign of dominance is thereby brought to a culturally acceptable end.

This shift in gender roles also returns us to the homoerotic themes of the novel. When Harker describes the women’s teeth grazing his neck, the imagery recalls the earlier descriptions of the Count’s teeth. Christopher Craft, in his work “‘Kiss Me with Those Red Lips’: Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker’s Dracula," argues that:

“we must remember that the vampire’s mouth is first of all Dracula’s mouth and that all subsequent versions of it (in Dracula all vampires other than the Count are female) merely repeat as diminished simulacra the desire of the Great original”

This suggests that the sisters can be interpreted as representations of Dracula’s homoerotic desires towards Harker. Because they reflect the Count’s image and act as extensions of himself, their desires can be understood as reflecting his own. Dracula’s homoerotic desire towards Harker is therefore expressed through the sisters. Gay themes are difficult to escape in the vampire genre, and it is important to recognise their presence. The fact that Dracula remains familiar to you, and most likely to much of the population, demonstrates how influential it became in comparison with its predecessors, The Vampyre and Carmilla. Its numerous adaptations and its influence on other cult classics, ranging from books and video games to real-life subcultures, have established both the novel and its central character as immensely important. Dracula solidified the vampire trope within Western culture, and reviews following the novel’s publication in May 1897 were positive. It quickly became the most popular work Bram Stoker had published, overshadowing his other novels and publications.

Despite its popularity and impact on the Gothic genre, the novel did not bring Stoker much fortune beyond a few royalties, which allowed him and his wife to live comfortably following its rise to public prominence. Although Stoker did not receive the financial reward he had hoped for, the novel remained sensational and influential for subsequent generations, becoming central to the cultural identity of vampires. It is nevertheless important to examine Stoker’s life to understand how he came to write this influential work of fiction.

Bram Stoker was born on November 8, 1847, in Dublin to Abraham Stoker and Charlotte Mathilda Blake Thornley. From an early age, he suffered from illness and remained bedridden for much of his childhood, forcing him to explore the world from his bedroom window. As a result, the young Stoker heard many Irish folktales from his mother during his illness, which may mark the beginning of his interest in the mythical. As he grew older, however, his illness began to subside, and he underwent a surprising transformation into an active young athlete. He won awards in shot put, gymnastics, long and high jumping, race walking, and weightlifting, particularly during his studies at Trinity College, where he received both a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts.

Stoker worked in the civil service, where he acquired his own office, which later expanded in both popularity and size. During this period, he married Florence Anne Lemon Balcombe and also wrote theatre reviews and critiques, through which he met Sir Henry Irving. Irving became one of Stoker’s closest friends and offered him a position at the London Lyceum Theatre. There, Stoker worked as a stagehand, secretary, accountant, and in other roles. His involvement in the creative scene was evident, and while managing the theatre, he began his literary career beyond writing manuals. His first work of fiction was The Snake’s Pass, a romance and thriller set in western Ireland in 1890. This Irish setting continued to recur throughout much of his subsequent writing.

Cut to a few years later, across the Atlantic, large waves of European immigration to the United States during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, particularly from Eastern and Southern Europe, brought the vampire myth with them, ready to sink its fangs into a new, unsuspecting neck.

Immigrants brought their folkloric traditions with them, including beliefs in supernatural creatures such as vampires. These beliefs were sometimes reinforced by newspaper reports, particularly sensational accounts of health crises and grave-digging in Eastern Europe. Public fascination with these stories grew, especially during the cholera and tuberculosis epidemics of the nineteenth century, both of which some people who believed in mysticism attributed to vampires.

Additionally, the American Gothic genre, which flourished in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, helped popularise the vampire myth in the United States. Stories of bloodsuckers and undead creatures found their way into American literature and, later, film, particularly through works such as F. W. Murnau’s Nosferatu (1922), which adapted Stoker’s Dracula.

Once the vampire myth had become embedded in the American cultural consciousness, it began to take on new forms. Hollywood films of the early twentieth century, particularly the 1931 film Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi, played a significant role in shaping the iconic image of the vampire in the United States. The vampire was no longer merely a terrifying creature from the Old World, but had become a fixture of American horror and a symbol of fear, sexual allure, and the forbidden.

As American horror fiction evolved, vampires became central figures in books, films, and television shows, often portrayed as tragic or sympathetic characters, as seen in Anne Rice’s The Vampire Chronicles and the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The evolution of the vampire myth in American culture reflects broader shifts in societal fears, desires, and values.

The spread of vampire mythology in the United States is deeply intertwined with immigration, particularly from Eastern Europe, and with the distinctive cultural mixture found in places such as New Orleans, where Creole traditions played a significant role in shaping the American understanding of vampirism. Various historical, cultural, and social factors contributed to how vampires were viewed and portrayed in the United States, particularly in the South. To understand this development more closely, it is necessary to examine how the myth evolved within Creole culture and among other immigrant groups, shaping the American vampire narrative.

New Orleans, a city with a history deeply influenced by French, Spanish, African, and Caribbean cultures, became an important location where European folklore, particularly vampire mythology, interacted with African, Caribbean, and Indigenous beliefs. Creole culture, an eclectic blend of these traditions, provided fertile ground for the vampire myth to evolve. In Louisiana, Creole culture was heavily influenced by Haitian Vodou (or Voodoo), which has its roots in West African spiritual practices. Like many African diasporic religions, Vodou incorporates rich beliefs concerning spirits, ancestors, and the supernatural, which intersected with European folk traditions.

The Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) was a defining event, as thousands of Haitians fled to Louisiana following the successful slave revolt, bringing with them their knowledge of Vodou, folklore, and spiritual practices. This contributed to a vibrant atmosphere of superstition and mysticism, in which stories of the undead, spirits, and blood-drinking entities were common.

The Haitian influence on the American vampire myth can be seen in the figure of Marie Laveau, the famous Creole Voodoo queen of New Orleans. Although she was not directly a vampire, Laveau’s reputation as a powerful spiritual figure connects her to the idea of controlling life and death, a recurring theme in vampire lore.

Founded by the French in 1718 and later controlled by Spain, New Orleans had a long history of French and Spanish colonial culture, which blended European folk traditions with African, Caribbean, and Indigenous elements. The French brought with them beliefs in revenants, and these tales merged with local stories. The French version of the vampire was often more romantic and mysterious, aligning with the Gothic aesthetic, while Spanish influence introduced ideas of evil spirits and damnation.

This cultural mixture contributed to the development of a distinctive Creole vampire tradition, which was often more mystical and shamanistic than the strictly European vampire figure. Creole vampires were sometimes depicted as beings capable of interacting with the spiritual world and moving between the realms of life and death, much like the zombie, which could be both dead and alive.

In modern American culture, the vampire has evolved far beyond its original folkloric roots. The romanticised vampire familiar to contemporary audiences, as seen in Twilight, True Blood, and Interview with the Vampire, emerged in the late twentieth century, blending Gothic horror, teen romance, and the sexual allure of the vampire figure. These portrayals often engage with broader themes of immigration, identity, and belonging. Vampires are no longer merely monsters, but complex and often sympathetic characters who must navigate human emotions, relationships, and their own existential dilemmas.

A century later, a distinctive interpretation emerged, offering a new perspective on the vampire genre that had been shaped by its many preceding portrayals. In 1967, Interview with the Vampire was published by American author Anne Rice. It follows Louis de Pointe du Lac as he recounts to an unknown young boy how he was turned into a vampire by Lestat de Lioncourt and later adopted a child, Claudia, whom he also turned into a vampire. This novel establishes a different atmosphere within the vampire genre when compared with Dracula, for example. While retaining its Gothic undertones, it offers significantly different and more contemporary depictions of vampires, particularly in comparison with Count Dracula. Louis, Lestat, and many of the supporting characters are portrayed as more sympathetic and human-like than the shallowly depicted monster that is the Count. Interview with the Vampire also presents vampires as more serene and outwardly seductive, harkening back to Lord Ruthven, and frequently places them within an androgynous aesthetic. In her work “The Vampire's Evolution in Literature,” Gudmundsdottir states that Rice’s novel was highly influential in shaping public perceptions of vampires, casting them in a more sympathetic light than any previous work of vampire fiction. To say that vampires had entered the limelight would be an understatement of the novel’s impact.

At the beginning of the story, the reader listens to Louis describe his life, through which Anne Rice provides the first physical description of Lestat: “He was very handsome then. He had the smoothest skin and the largest blue eyes. He was robust, not thin as I am now and was then... but his eyes... it was as if when I looked into his eyes I was standing alone on the edge of the world... on a windswept ocean beach” (p. 20). Rice describes Lestat as handsome, with smooth skin and large blue eyes. These features, alongside many others, continue to receive praise through Louis’s narration throughout the novel. From the outset, the reader develops a well-rounded impression of how vampires are depicted in this work. Rice emphasizes serene, otherworldly features, such as smooth skin and physical beauty. Although this portrayal was not the first of its kind within vampire literature, it brought the emerging stereotype into the public eye.

Furthermore, Lestat occupies a more complex role in the novel than many vampires who preceded him, possessing greater depth and eliciting sympathy despite his bloodthirsty nature. Marie Bargas, a vampire expert on Entertainment Tonight, stated during an impromptu interview that “Our love affair with the handsome Trickster began with Rice’s Vampire Lestat and continues today with Marvel’s Loki.” The generational influence of Rice’s vampires is evident in modern media. Rather than presenting a vicious beast, this imagery offers an attractive man whose serene features are comparable to, or even surpass, those of an ordinary human man.

Another description of Lestat by Rice, narrated through Louis’s perspective after he sees Lestat return to his plantation, further illustrates his physical beauty: “He came in from the courtyard, opening the French doors without a sound, a tall fair-skinned man with a mass of blond hair and a graceful, almost feline quality to his movements” (p. 26). Descriptive terms such as “tall,” “fair-skinned,” and “graceful”create a more appealing image of the vampire presented to readers. These descriptors portray vampiric features in a more favourable light than many earlier representations. As vampires continued to develop through new literature and writing, they became more contemporary figures within Western popular culture. Rice’s portrayal of vampires is substantially transformed while retaining a sense of nostalgia for the “old vampire”: it preserves their horrific association with death while giving them features considered attractive by Western standards. Lestat’s smooth skin and graceful movements contrast with the terrible descriptions associated with early vampires, significantly humanizing him as a character. By avoiding the depiction of Lestat and Louis as “hideous” and one-dimensional in appearance and behaviour, Rice makes it easier for readers to support and sympathize with them.

Louis’s descriptions of Lestat even extend to comparisons with biblical angels: “Of course, you must realize that all this time the vampire Lestat was extraordinary. He was no more human to me than a biblical angel” (p. 29). In this instance, inhumanity is not presented as a negative quality but rather as something ethereal, with Louis describing Lestat as “extraordinary.”

Throughout the story, Rice presents certain features as positive and attractive that had previously been condemned in earlier representations. One such feature is extreme paleness. Whereas stark whiteness was originally associated with sickness and, once again, undead creatures, Rice presents paleness as awe-inspiring: “He had seemed white to me before, starkly white so that in the night he was almost luminous; and now I saw him filled with his own life and own blood: he was radiant, not luminous” (p. 33). Extreme paleness is no longer merely admired; it is further described as “radiant, not luminous,” suggesting that the character is not sickly and dead but, in some way, human.

Another notable aspect of the characters’ descriptions is the androgyny exhibited by the male vampires. In the 1970s, alongside the rise of the feminist movement, fashion and self-presentation became more androgynous, both as a form of political activism and as a departure from traditionally restrictive masculine presentation. This cultural development is reflected in Rice’s descriptions of characters such as Lestat, Louis, and Armand. Rather than angular faces, facial hair, and muscular builds, they possess youthful, ageless faces, large eyes, slim figures, and long hair. Rice writes, “Then again I saw the vampire's face floating in his flame, his ageless eyes circled in dark lashes” (p. 231).

During Louis’s time among the celebrating crowd of vampires, he notices Armand. When Louis and Claudia arrive in France during Louis’s journey to understand himself as a vampire, they discover the Théâtre des Vampires, which consists of a large group of vampires who engage in activities such as sacrifices, sexual acts, and partying. While surrounded by this celebrating crowd, Louis spots Armand in the distance, feeding on a human. Rice’s initial description of Armand already suggests his beauty, as the first features introduced are his “ageless eyes,”which are “circled by dark lashes.”It is later revealed that he has long auburn hair, which attracts Louis to him, as illustrated in the passage: “His face was as tranquil as always, his smooth, white forehead beneath the shock of his auburn hair without a trace of care, his large eyes reflecting on me” (p. 282–283). Once again, Rice emphasizes smooth, white skin and large eyes.

Another instance of androgyny in appearance occurs when Armand leads Louis away from the crowd of vampires into a secluded room with Claudia and an unnamed boy who lies beside her: “His black hair parted in the middle and curling about his ears so that he looked now in his dreamy, fevered state like one of those lithe androgynous creatures of a Botticelli painting” (p. 233). Here, the word 'androgynous'is explicitly used to describe the character, whose beauty is even compared to that of a Botticelli painting. He is described as “dreamy” and “lithe,”with curled hair, all of which relate to the androgynous fashion and appearance of the 1970s. The civil rights, women’s liberation, and LGBT rights revolutions made it possible for individuals to dress and present themselves in more exploratory ways. This emphasis on individualism and self-expression significantly influenced fashion and popular culture, resulting in the emergence of numerous parallel fashion styles.

In summary, the vampires in Interview with the Vampire are depicted as more sympathetic and human-like than in previous representations. They are described as attractive and passionate, with an emphasis on androgyny that draws upon the revolutionary fashion of the 1970s, as well as the role vampires played in Western popular-culture literature. The genre thus transitions from folklore into fantasy while continuing to retain its Gothic character.

The way culture approaches and describes queerness in literature has evolved drastically over the past few decades, let alone centuries. In the nineteenth century, male-to-male homosexuality rarely had a place in literature because it was considered a taboo issue and was associated with the previously discussed threat of otherness, ostracization, and punishment. The relationships between the characters Louis and Lestat, as well as the background character Armand, suggest a deeper bond from the very beginning of the story. This is reinforced by the setting in which the novel opens: a secret bar on the edge of Divisadero Street in San Francisco, near what is considered the “gay” district. In his book “Anne Rice and the Queering of Culture,” George E. Haggerty considers this setting “a straightforward parody of queer seduction” and argues that Rice “uses the imagery of gay life to give her characters substance and texture.” However, the instances of homoeroticism are not limited to possessiveness or lust; they also encompass intimacy and passion. Louis’s relationship with Lestat emerges very early in the story. Writing from Louis’s perspective, Rice vividly describes Lestat’s appealing features in a manner that suggests infatuation: “[Lestat] lay down beside me now on the steps, his movement so graceful and so personal that at once it made me think of a lover” (p. 31). The bond between a vampire and the person who creates them has already been established as deeply intimate. Louis appears to examine Lestat’s body language as reminiscent of a lover, suggesting a relationship that extends beyond that between a vampire and their creator and approaches the boundary of romantic admiration.

Rice uses explicitly suggestive language to describe Lestat’s interactions with Louis, particularly during his transformation: “I remember that the movement of his lips raised the hair all over my body, sending a shock of sensation through my body that was not unlike the pleasure of passion” (p. 32). Lestat describes the sensation as a striking contrast to the old vampire myth’s emphasis on painful bites. Throughout this interaction, Louis describes his sensations in detail without mentioning a moment in which he resists or attempts to fight them. This creates imagery of two lovers engaging in intimacy, with the added element of blood.

Another pronounced instance of this dynamic occurs when Armand confesses his feelings to Louis at the vampire theatre: “‘I want you. I want you more than anything in the world.’” (p. 282). Vampirism is therefore used as a means of incorporating sexuality and desire, and, more specifically, homosexual desire, in other words, as a way of writing about sex without writing about sex.”

From their shadowy origins in Slavic folklore and disease-fueled village superstitions to the romanticized, deeply psychological figures of modern popular culture, vampires have consistently served as mirrors for society’s deepest anxieties. Across centuries of literary evolution, the vampire archetype has shapeshifted to reflect changing cultural paradigms. Early Slavic myths of restless, disease-bringing spirits established a framework of fear that expanded through historical panics and inspired foundational Gothic works such as Polidori’s The Vampyre.

Wilson, Katharina M. "The History of the Word 'Vampire'." Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 46, no. 4, 1985.​

Stepanic, Stanley. "The Origins of the Vampire' with Stanley Stepanic (GSAS '07, '12)." YouTube, uploaded by UVA Engagement, 9 Nov. 2023.​

Isaacs-Thomas, Bella. "How Vampire Lore Emerged from Shadowy Medical Mysteries." PBS NewsHour, 31 Oct. 2023.​

Hall, Coy. "The Horrors of History: Vampires." Ashland Community & Technical College Blog, 14 Jan. 2022.​

Kelly, Jane. "How the Spread of Disease Juiced the Lore of Vampires into Pandemic Proportions." UVA Today, University of Virginia, 28 Oct. 2020.​

"Porphyria: The Facts Behind the So-Called Vampire Disease." Medicover Genetics, 19 Oct. 2022.​

Hefferon, Michael. "Vampire Myths Originated with a Real Blood Disorder." The Conversation, 29 June 2020.​

Rachel Erin Catlett Widmer: "Curing Consumption: Blood Drinkers of the Nineteenth Century".​

John William Polidori. "The Vampyre".​

Hall, Jamie. "An Exploration of the Vampire and its Sexuality." Booklytical, 10 July 2020.​

Rutigliano, Olivia. "Why Polidori's The Vampyre Was Falsely Attributed to Lord Byron." Literary Hub, 14 June 2024.​

Mary Shelley. Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, Preface and Letters, 1818.​

Macdonald, D. L. Poor Polidori: A Critical Biography of the Author of The Vampyre. University of Toronto Press, 1991.​

Thomas Moore. The life, letters and journals of Lord Byron, 1818.​

VanDyke, Bryan. "The Haunted Writing Life of John Polidori." The Millions, 19 Apr. 2023.​

Hernandez, J. A. "Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu." J.A. Hernandez, 11 Jan. 2022.​

Sheridan Le Fanu. "Carmilla", 1872.​

"J. Sheridan Le Fanu's Carmilla: Inspirations, Interpretations, & a Deep Literary Analysis." Old Style Tales, 18 Jan. 2024.​

Hume, Robert D. "Gothic versus Romantic: A Revaluation of the Gothic Novel." PMLA, vol. 84, no. 2, 1969.​

Clark, Anna. "Anne Lister's Construction of Lesbian Identity." Journal of the History of Sexuality, vol. 7, no. 1, 1996.​

Miller, Lauren. "Friendships, Lesbianism and Identity in Victorian Britain." The York Historian, 6 July 2017.​

"History of Ireland (1801-1923)." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, Wikimedia Foundation.​

Cooke, Simon. "An Introduction to the Life and Work of J. S. Le Fanu." The Victorian Web, 6 Jan. 2021.​

"They Walk Among US: Vampire and Immigration in Victorian London." Tenement Museum, 28 Oct. 2014.​

Stoker, Bram. Dracula, Planetebook.​

Allan Nadler. "IMAGINARY Vampires, Imagined Jews." Jewish Ideas Daily, 11 July.​

Galchinsky, M. "Otherness and identity in the Victorian novel." Victorian Literary Cultures: A Critical Companion, edited by W. Baker & K. Womack, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002, pp. 403-420.​

Muskovits, Eszter. "The Threat of Otherness in Bram Stoker's Dracula." TRANS-. Revue De Littérature Générale Et Comparée, Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, 08 July 2010.​

Craft, Christopher. "'Kiss Me with Those Red Lips': Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker's Dracula." Representations, no. 8, 1984, pp. 107-133.​

Stoker, W. Parker. "Bram Stoker's Life & Family." Bram Stoker Estate, 2018.​

Skelton, Robin. "Bram Stoker." Encyclopædia Britannica, 16 Apr. 2024.​

David Skal. The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror, 1993.​

S. T. Joshi. The Modern Weird Tale, 2017.​

David J. Skal. Hollywood Gothic: The Tangled Web of Dracula from Novel to Stage to Screen, 1990.​

M. L. Johnson. Voodoo: The History and Legacy of the African American Religion in Louisiana, 2007.​

Robert Tallman. The Voodoo Queen of New Orleans: The Legend of Marie Laveau, 2010.​

Gwendolyn Midlo Hall. Africans in Colonial Louisiana: The Development of Afro-Creole Culture in the Eighteenth Century, 1992.​

Gudmundsdottir, Berglind. The Vampire's Evolution in Literature: The Influence of Bram Stoker's Dracula Has Had on The Works of Writers of Modern Young Adult Vampire Fiction. School of Humanities, May 2015.​

Rice, Anne. Interview with the Vampire. Ballantine Books, New York, 1976.​

Tony Sokol et al. "Interview with the Vampire and the Origin of Remorseful Bloodsuckers." Den of Geek, 11 Nov. 2019.​

"How Individuality, Androgyny, and Activism INSPIRED '70s Fashion." The Shutterstock Blog, 08 Sept. 2017.​

Haggerty, George E. "Anne Rice and the Queering of Culture." NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, vol. 32, no. 1, 1998, pp. 5-18.​

Osap, Sonja. Queer as Vampires - A Study of Anne Rice's Interview With The Vampire through Queer Theory. School of Languages and Literature/English.